Apr 28, 2010

Article by

Genre:
Category: Features, Interview

Undeadisco & TapeDeck Bros Interview + Daft Punk Cover

I had the opportunity to chat with my colleague and resident house author, Paul Revered, this week, along with our friend Ash of TapeDeck Bros fame. The two, along with support from other local musicians, have recently been embarking on some interesting ventures lately, covering old electronic anthems between spinning several shows a week between the lot of them, including a weekly spot on dubplate.fm. In addition to answering my inquiries, the gents have also shared their latest cover, or what Paul described for me one night as a re-imagining from the ground up. Before we go on, I’d like to commend the guys – too often is serious work like this relegated to the “bootlegs” bin, when in any other genre we’d call it a cover. Maybe it’s easier to accept in this case because, in addition to building it from the ground up, the guys have covered the vocals and added acoustic instrumentation, but I’ll leave that for you to decide!

Cal: What is the name of your project, and who are its members?

Paul: Our project is nameless for meow. Its members are Ash Ainsworth (Tape Deck Bros) and Paul Revered (undeadisco), including contributions from Bahraini vocalist Majid Ali, saxophonist Rob Christian, ADHD Theatre, The Frandiscos, Riviera, and more talented musicians yet to convert.

Cal: Tell us about your production cred! How long have you been doing what you do? What are your tools of the trade?

Paul: I’m a production novice. My place in house music has been determined by my relationship with it: from sneaking out to revel in house at loft parties in 97 to making the recent leap to production; I’ve gone from distant crush to slave by marriage. I’m always learning and have many teachers to thank such as Day, GoldSpade, WhiteHawk, and Colin Sims. My DAW is Ableton Live 8.

Ash: I’ve been working with various DAWs for 8 years, but made the turn to producing dance music in 2008, when I got sick of produce bands at the time, but that is something I find myself going back to. I came from classical training in vocals, theory, and trained on chelo, guitar, bass, drums. I was in a few musicals, joined a barber shop quartet, even dabbled in tap. More recently I formed a band, including Christofer TapeDeck, called Animal Clinic. It was during this time we quit the band and turned into the Tape Deck Bros.

Cal: When did you start the project?

Paul: We’ve been working together a few weeks. The interest has been brewing as long as we’ve been collaborating as DJs, and more specifically after we began the Dilated Pixels collective, a fictional group striving for musical freedom. It’s paramount to our improvement as producers to satisfy ourselves and others by collaborating and developing new characters and styles all the time. Ash remarks how inspiring it is that his favourite producers in the city seem to be up at the crack of dawn working on their shit.

Cal: Why did you guys start the project?

Paul: We really respect each other as artists, and feel our strengths balance each other out. We come from two different places in music, while having great pride in each other’s tastes, so the intersection of our perspectives makes for fun dance music for a broad audience.

Ash: Completely agree.

Cal: You have done some covers, integrating acoustic instrumentation – is this a theme or a flavour?

Ash: Music is always changing, especially the tastes of the dance scene. Yesterday it was the distorted basslines of electro, today its balkan beat, so who knows what tomorrow will bring. We love all these styles for their own reasons, and so are looking to break from the status quo without upsetting the ebb and flow of dance. For instance, the Harder Better Faster Stronger cover was a statement about the music behind electro; Daft Punk may have fathered the modern electrohouse genre, but theirs was simply a glitchier take on what disco-edit DJs were already doing at the time. Our cover brings us back to the organic roots of Edwin Birdsong’s Cola Bottle Baby, and what natural wonders lay dormant and obfuscated in the 90s dance hit, and more recently in Kanye’s pastiche. We are not exclusively making covers, but covers are a legitimate way of paying dues and tribute. In other cases, we’ll simply re-articulate a previously used sample, or more likely discover groove untouched by past DJs.

Paul: The reason why these covers are relevant to Ash personally is that whenever he hears music he loves, he tries to see if the song or parts of it can be re-articulated. May i remind you that we are living in post-modern age of symbolic communication. it seems that people are dying to hear music they missed due to their young age… and they want it re-articulated a way to suit the times. We’re taking a loose, organic, and homage paying approach to house. Essentially, rediscovering house.

Cal: Are you interested in creating electronic performances with live elements?

Paul: In this day and age, the music business has reverted to a modern version of an old paradigm, followed to this day by bands like Fish and The Dead: artists must be performers, thus the strong aspiration for DJs to produce, and producers to DJ. Let’s face it, nobody is paying their mortgage off Beatport or Juno sales; the real money lies in performance. We have yet to develop the catalogue necessary to perform in a ‘band’ form at this time, however you can rest assured that this is the plan for the future of our movement.

Cal: Are you aiming to release music? If so, will you start with singles, an EP, or an album?

Paul: We are definitely going to release music, hence the unwillingness to leak the fruits of our labour. It’s unclear what form our music takes in terms of product marketing, but I can tell you that we have no intention of producing CDs.

Ash: Put it this way: your music is either a consumable or a collectible, thus digital or wax. There is no alternative.

Tape Deck Bros + Paul Revered ft. Majid - Harder Better Faster Stronger (Daft Punk Cover).mp3

Related Articles

More Articles About The Artist(s)

, , , , , ,

  1. meh says:

    virtual dj?

  2. sarah says:

    i can tell a lot of work went into this and its a really great effort. i just dont understand why anyone would listen or play this instead of the original. the vocals sound home made and canadian. it all does. actually, this song sucks. sorry.

  3. tom says:

    i disagree sarah, this track is dope. the voice is soulful and the baseline is clever. tape deck bros and paul revered have done a great job!

  4. Lindsey says:

    “Put it this way: your music is either a consumable or a collectible, thus digital or wax. There is no alternative.”

    <3

  5. undeadisco.com says:

    @SARAH

    “the vocals sound home made and canadian. it all does.” -sarah

    i’m with you sarah! this is canadian music. but the vocals are bahraini, to be correct. and daft punk is french. and edwin birdsong is american.. that game was fun!

  6. DJ Cal | SalaciousSound says:

    the internet is for hate

  7. sarah says:

    hey i started off by saying i could tell a lot of work went into it. by sounding “canadian” i was referring to the quality of sound recording. not the composition. whats the point of asking for comments if everyone plans on ganging up on someone who says something they dont agree on? should all the comments say this song is amazing? whats the point in that?

  8. tomD says:

    Cover? You cant cover a sample…..
    Unless you guys recreated that, but I have my doubts.
    Its a ‘rerender’ or ‘re-edit’ or ‘remix’ of sorts.
    You could get me going all day on this stupidity.

    How about you don’t re make other peoples music to become individuals. Try making your own.

    PS. the sax is a little flat.

  9. DON'T HATE ON THIS SONG says:

    HEY FUCKERS. THIS IS RELLI GUD. SHUD UP YO

  10. rsugrove says:

    @sarah

    You’re getting criticized because you’re ignorant. If someone is going to critique a song in any sort of intelligible way, they’ll provide something to support their point of view. People may listen to this over the original because A) from an objective production point of view, it adds completely new elements that are absent in the original B) some people actually appreciate local talent and C) some people just think it’s a solid tune. Obviously you’re not one of those people and disagree in any case. Okay fine, except your support is that “It sucks and sounds canadian”. What does that even mean to sound canadian? I’m sure you know enough about the canadian music industry in its entirety to enlighten us all. We all love Daft Punk, but do us all a favour and leave the inane mouth-garbage in your head.

  11. Alex says:

    So, your saying that canadian music is badly produced? This proves that you are ignorant because you generalize in such stupid ways, and that you haven’t heard alot of well produced canadian music. Take deadmau5 for example, say what you will about his music, but the quality of his recordings are impeccable. Some of the music industries best producers are canadian. Saying that canadian recordings are of a lesser quality is idiotic.

    You miss are a music RACIST!!!

  12. Davis O says:

    I quite like this song, to others according to the comments before me, you think its quote “Canadian” and that its not made well or some crap. this song rocks. I’m canadian and i think that are music is pretty damn sexy.This song makes me want to listen to the original, but i seam to want to come back to this after.

    Why do you gotsta judge by comparing it to other songs? its a song, you either like it or dislike it. judge the song by how you think it sounds not other crap.

    now go back to your twinkies and snowballs and realize canada is epic (im not a very good example though im a childish idiot)

  13. sarah says:

    the only people who like this song are from Canada. i have a feeling 90% of ppl on this salacious sound thing are from toronto. that got me thinking about why there are so many hearts on hypem. you guys had a little get together where everyone clicks the heart and makes a shitty song look popular. how socialist can you get? lets just see how many people outside of toronto and canada take this song seriously. whos ignorant now?

    PS
    ” How about you don’t re make other peoples music to become individuals. Try making your own.

    PS. the sax is a little flat.”

    TRUTH.

  14. anonymous says:

    This song is not produced well though…regardless of opinion, it still sounds very amatuerish; i.e. the vocals aren’t even in key…

  15. David Robinson says:

    Sax is pretty tight, but i would dump the vocals. But after that its just Daft Punks original anyways… too many mixed feelings ill say 4/10

  16. Alex says:

    People like the Sarah are the reason that sometimes, despite being a right wing bastard, i doubt the value of freedom of speech. Maybe we could limit the ammount of pure stupidity flows from the mouth of ignorant idiots. Say you don’t like the track fine, but turning this into a little canada bashing rant is silly.

    Plus american is on its way to being a failed state. Your music is of the same quality as your cars. There i have stooped to your level.

  17. jonesalyssa says:

    Sarah.
    Your ignorance is very, very embarassing.

  18. Ash says:

    This is so cool. I have never seen so much fuss over something I had my hand in.
    But… At the haters. I notice anyone with something bad to say never has
    the facts right. I’m down to take the hits but we are pretty new
    at production still..

    Check us on hypem though. This track went to number six. Not bad for some
    amatuer vdj using jerks from Canada. Search tape deck bros and check some
    of our stuff. Tell me if u hate those ones 2! Lol

    anyways. This was neat. I’ll work harder better faster and stronger on the next one!
    :p

  19. John says:

    Those boxes and Ash and Chris’s look childish

Leave a Reply